On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:38, Jeff Layton wrote: > In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is > used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of > inode->i_ctime. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > diff --git a/fs/romfs/super.c b/fs/romfs/super.c > index c59b230d55b4..961b9d342e0e 100644 > --- a/fs/romfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/romfs/super.c > @@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ static struct inode *romfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long pos) > > set_nlink(i, 1); /* Hard to decide.. */ > i->i_size = be32_to_cpu(ri.size); > - i->i_mtime.tv_sec = i->i_atime.tv_sec = i->i_ctime.tv_sec = 0; > - i->i_mtime.tv_nsec = i->i_atime.tv_nsec = i->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0; > + i->i_mtime.tv_sec = i->i_atime.tv_sec = inode_set_ctime(i, 0, 0).tv_sec; > + i->i_mtime.tv_nsec = i->i_atime.tv_nsec = 0; The usual simplification: i->i_mtime = i->i_atime = inode_set_ctime(i, 0, 0); Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
