On Wed 05-07-23 15:01:33, Jeff Layton wrote: > In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is > used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of > inode->i_ctime. > > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > --- > fs/pstore/inode.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/pstore/inode.c b/fs/pstore/inode.c > index ffbadb8b3032..a756af980d0c 100644 > --- a/fs/pstore/inode.c > +++ b/fs/pstore/inode.c > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static struct inode *pstore_get_inode(struct super_block *sb) > struct inode *inode = new_inode(sb); > if (inode) { > inode->i_ino = get_next_ino(); > - inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode); > + inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(inode); > } > return inode; > } > @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ int pstore_mkfile(struct dentry *root, struct pstore_record *record) > inode->i_private = private; > > if (record->time.tv_sec) > - inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = record->time; > + inode->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, record->time); > > d_add(dentry, inode); > > -- > 2.41.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR