On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:50:15PM -0500, Steve French wrote: > this looks useful (although we have a few more serious problems where we > don't keep the cached mtime/ctime/size for files that have RW or RWH leases > so can update the mtime/ctime/size from the server version of it which can > be stale in cases where we are caching writes (with leases). > > Which tree do you want this patch to go through? Plan is to take it all through the vfs tree.
