On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 10:21 +0200, Marco wrote: > > Mmm...MEM_MAJOR and RAMDISK_MAJOR have the same value and pramfs works > in memory. We could simply use /dev/null (there was an error in the > submitted kconfig description, my intention was to use /dev/mem). In > that case I can use UNNAMED_MAJOR. PRAMFS root option is not enabled > if it's already enabled the NFS one. What do you think? Why use a major number at all? See how we handle mtd and ubi devices in prepare_namespace() -- can't you do something similar? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
