>> No, I'm saying your concerns are baseless and too vague to >> address. > If you don't address them, the NAK will stand forever, or at least > until a different group of people take over x86 maintainership. > That's fine with me. I've got a specific concern: I don't see vmalloc_exec() used in this series anywhere. I also don't see any of the actual assembly that's being generated, or the glue code that's calling into the generated assembly. I grepped around a bit in your git trees, but I also couldn't find it in there. Any chance you could help a guy out and point us to some of the specifics of this new, tiny JIT? >> Andy, I replied explaining the difference between text_poke() and >> text_poke_sync(). It's clear you have no idea what you're talking about, >> so I'm not going to be wasting my time on further communications with >> you. One more specific concern: This comment made me very uncomfortable and it read to me very much like a personal attack, something which is contrary to our code of conduct.
