20.06.2023 19:36, Matthew Wilcox пишет:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:47:31PM +0500, stsp wrote:
20.06.2023 18:46, Matthew Wilcox пишет:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 06:39:07PM +0500, stsp wrote:
Though it will, for sure, represent the
task that _owns_ the lock.
No, it *DOESN'T*. I can open a file, SCM_RIGHTS pass it to another task
and then exit. Now the only owner of that lock is the recipient ...
Won't I get the recipient's pid in an
l_pid then?
You snipped the part where I pointed out that at times there can be
_no_ task that owns it. open a fd, set the lock, pass the fd to another
task, exit. until that task calls recvmsg(), no task owns it.
Hmm, interesting case.
So at least it seems if recipient also exits,
then the untransferred fd gets closed.
Does this mean, by any chance, that the
recipient actually owns an fd before
recvmsg() is done?
