Re: RFC: kill msdos and vfat modules?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:26:22AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> > There's almost no code left in the msdos and vfat modules with all
>> > the guts in the shared fat module.  Shouldn't we just do away with
>> > the vfat and msdos modules and just provide module aliases in the
>> > main fat module?
>> 
>> I have no objection to it if it works. Maybe, one concern is the order
>> of detection (rootfs, /proc/filesystems) when it's not moudle. (however,
>> probably it's not hard to control).
>
> For the non-modular case detection order is already determined by link
> order, so nothing would change, at least if we still keep config options
> to allow for 8.3 vs vfat naming.  Then again the former is so simple
> that we could always compile it in anyway.

If modules was merged to one, msdos and vfat in fs/Makefile will be
merged too. If so, it will not define the link order anymore.  Anyway,
nothing would be hard, but, I guess there is the change which need to care.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux