Re: [PATCHv10 8/8] iomap: Add per-block dirty state tracking to improve performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ritesh: Dump the enum; "because btrfs does it" is not sufficient
> justification.  The rest is good enough, I'll put it in iomap-for-next
> along with willy's thing as soon as 6.5-rc1 closes, and if you all have
> further complaints, send your own patches.

Sure, Darrick. I agree that enum created more confusion than help (sorry
aobut that). I will dump it in the next revision & address Matthew's
review comment on the variable naming.

I agree to lock the current set of changes as functionality wise those
are looking good from everyone. Any further optimizations/improvements
can be handled seperately so that we don't complicate this one.  

Thanks once again Darrick and all the other reviewers!!

-ritesh

I am pulled into something else for next couple of days. Post that I
will work on it to get next revision out.  



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux