On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:29:30PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Thank you. Basically I'm not sure if UBIFS guarantees it won't be > unmounted (hence the MS_ACTIVE bit is on) when calling > generic_sync_sb_inodes() in shrink_liability() and ubifs_sync_fs(). Btw, the call in ubifs_sync_fs should be superflous in the vfs-2.6#for-next tree. We now do make sure that all inodes are flushed before calling ->sync_fs with the wait parameter. shrink_liability is a more interesting case, I don't understand enough of ubifs to comment on it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
