Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Brian Molnar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > This sounds very strange - different processes (or even the same
> > > process using different file handles) will see different results
> > > for fstat() which are yet different from stat(). I can't imagine
> > > that applications would like this at all.
> >
> > Ya, no doubt a good deal of applications would get very confused if
> > they didn't know the difference. And it is not the goal of this FS to
> > support the use of general applications.
>
> Actually, well written applications shouldn't assume that
> fd=open(path);fstat(fd) is equivalent to fd=open(path);stat(path).
> Why? Because the second one is racy wrt. remove and rename.
No, but well written applications can and do assume this:
st1=stat(path)
...time passes, maybe do some filesystem operations, talk on the network...
fd=open(path)
st2=fstat(fd)
if (st1!=st2)
abort or loop "Race happened, something changed under me..."
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
