On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 01:46:32PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > /* > - * Each block ramdisk device has a xarray brd_pages of pages that stores > - * the pages containing the block device's contents. A brd page's ->index is > - * its offset in PAGE_SIZE units. This is similar to, but in no way connected > - * with, the kernel's pagecache or buffer cache (which sit above our block > - * device). > + * Each block ramdisk device has a xarray of folios that stores the folios > + * containing the block device's contents. A brd folio's ->index is its offset > + * in PAGE_SIZE units. This is similar to, but in no way connected with, > + * the kernel's pagecache or buffer cache (which sit above our block device). Having read my way to the end of the series, I can now circle back and say this comment is wrong. The folio->index is its offset in PAGE_SIZE units if the sector size is <= PAGE_SIZE, otherwise it's the offset in sector size units. This is _different from_ the pagecache which uses PAGE_SIZE units and multi-index entries in the XArray. > @@ -144,29 +143,29 @@ static int copy_to_brd_setup(struct brd_device *brd, sector_t sector, size_t n, > static void copy_to_brd(struct brd_device *brd, const void *src, > sector_t sector, size_t n) > { > - struct page *page; > + struct folio *folio; > void *dst; > unsigned int offset = (sector & (PAGE_SECTORS-1)) << SECTOR_SHIFT; > size_t copy; > > copy = min_t(size_t, n, PAGE_SIZE - offset); > - page = brd_lookup_page(brd, sector); > - BUG_ON(!page); > + folio = brd_lookup_folio(brd, sector); > + BUG_ON(!folio); > > - dst = kmap_atomic(page); > - memcpy(dst + offset, src, copy); > - kunmap_atomic(dst); > + dst = kmap_local_folio(folio, offset); > + memcpy(dst, src, copy); > + kunmap_local(dst); This should use memcpy_to_folio(), which doesn't exist yet. Compile-tested patch incoming shortly ... > + folio = brd_lookup_folio(brd, sector); > + if (folio) { > + src = kmap_local_folio(folio, offset); > + memcpy(dst, src, copy); > + kunmap_local(src); And this will need memcpy_from_folio(), patch for that incoming too. > @@ -226,15 +225,15 @@ static int brd_do_bvec(struct brd_device *brd, struct page *page, > goto out; > } > > - mem = kmap_atomic(page); > + mem = kmap_local_folio(folio, off); > if (!op_is_write(opf)) { > - copy_from_brd(mem + off, brd, sector, len); > - flush_dcache_page(page); > + copy_from_brd(mem, brd, sector, len); > + flush_dcache_folio(folio); Nngh. This will need to be a more complex loop. I don't think we can do a simple abstraction here. Perhaps you can base it on the two patches you're about to see?