The check for the folio being under writeback is unnecessary; the caller has checked this and the folio is locked, so the folio cannot be under writeback at this point. The comment is somewhat misleading in that it talks about one specific situation in which we can see a dirty folio. There are others, so change the comment to explain why we can't release the iomap_page. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c index 08ee293c4117..2054b85c9d9b 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c @@ -483,12 +483,10 @@ bool iomap_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp_flags) folio_size(folio)); /* - * mm accommodates an old ext3 case where clean folios might - * not have had the dirty bit cleared. Thus, it can send actual - * dirty folios to ->release_folio() via shrink_active_list(); - * skip those here. + * If the folio is dirty, we refuse to release our metadata because + * it may be partially dirty (FIXME, add a test for that). */ - if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || folio_test_writeback(folio)) + if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) return false; iomap_page_release(folio); return true; -- 2.39.2
