Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] INFO: task hung in btrfs_sync_file (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:45:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:24:05PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:15:06PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > > RIP: 0010:rep_movs_alternative+0x33/0xb0 arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:56
> > > Code: 46 83 f9 08 73 21 85 c9 74 0f 8a 06 88 07 48 ff c7 48 ff c6 48 ff c9 75 f1 c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 8b 06 <48> 89 07 48 83 c6 08 48 83 c7 08 83 e9 08 74 df 83 f9 08 73 e8 eb
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffc9000becf728 EFLAGS: 00050206
> > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000038 RCX: 0000000000000038
> > > RDX: fffff520017d9efb RSI: ffffc9000becf7a0 RDI: 0000000020000120
> > > RBP: 0000000020000120 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffff520017d9efa
> > > R10: ffffc9000becf7d7 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffc9000becf7a0
> > > R13: 0000000020000158 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffc9000becf7a0
> > >  copy_user_generic arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:112 [inline]
> > >  raw_copy_to_user arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:133 [inline]
> > >  _copy_to_user lib/usercopy.c:41 [inline]
> > >  _copy_to_user+0xab/0xc0 lib/usercopy.c:34
> > >  copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:191 [inline]
> > >  fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x217/0x370 fs/ioctl.c:144
> > >  emit_fiemap_extent+0x18e/0x380 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2616
> > >  fiemap_process_hole+0x516/0x610 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2874
> > 
> > and extent enumeration from FIEMAP, this would qualify as a stress on
> > the inode
> 
> FWIW, when I've seen this sort of hang on XFS in past times, it's
> been caused by a corrupt extent list or a circular reference in a
> btree that the fuzzing introduced. Hence FIEMAP just keeps going
> around in circles and never gets out of the loop to drop the inode
> lock....

Thanks for the info. The provided reproducer was able to get the VM
stuck in a few hours so there is some problem. The generated image does
not show any obvious problem so it's either lack of 'check' capability
or the problem happens at run time.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux