On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > What code are you talking about? > > To the open path a few memory writes and a smp_wmb. No atomics and no > spin lock/unlocks. > > Are you complaining because I retain the file_list? Sorry, did I overlook the patch? Weren't a couple of atomic ops and a spin lock/unlock couple present in __dentry_open() (same sort of the release path)? And that's only like 5% of the code touched by the new special handling of the file operations structure (basically, every f_op access ends up being wrapped by two atomic ops and other extra code). The question, that I'd like to reiterate is, is this stuff really needed? Anyway, my complaint ends here and I'll let others evaluate if merging this patchset is worth the cost. - Davide -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
