Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: 48b1320a674e Merge tag 'for-6.4-rc4-tag' of git://git.kern.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10ccb25d280000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=162cf2103e4a7453 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e94d98936a0ed08bde43 compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.7, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1bdd53056bc4/disk-48b1320a.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/82950e95464f/vmlinux-48b1320a.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8a58eb21a7a7/bzImage-48b1320a.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+e94d98936a0ed08bde43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.4.0-rc4-syzkaller-00051-g48b1320a674e #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u4:0/15666 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88802d146268 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mark_as_free_ex+0x3d/0x330 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2464 but task is already holding lock: ffff88804bad60e0 (&ni->ni_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_trylock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1141 [inline] ffff88804bad60e0 (&ni->ni_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_write_inode+0x167/0x10c0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3252 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&ni->ni_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 ntfs_set_state+0x212/0x730 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:945 mark_as_free_ex+0x6e/0x330 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2466 run_deallocate_ex+0x244/0x5f0 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:122 attr_set_size+0x1684/0x4290 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:750 ntfs_truncate fs/ntfs3/file.c:393 [inline] ntfs3_setattr+0x556/0xb00 fs/ntfs3/file.c:682 notify_change+0xc8b/0xf40 fs/attr.c:483 do_truncate+0x220/0x300 fs/open.c:66 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3295 [inline] do_open fs/namei.c:3640 [inline] path_openat+0x294e/0x3170 fs/namei.c:3791 do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3818 do_sys_openat2+0x13f/0x500 fs/open.c:1356 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1372 [inline] __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1448 [inline] __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1442 [inline] __x64_sys_creat+0x123/0x160 fs/open.c:1442 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline] validate_chain+0x166b/0x58f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 __lock_acquire+0x1316/0x2070 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 down_write_nested+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689 mark_as_free_ex+0x3d/0x330 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2464 run_deallocate+0x13b/0x230 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2534 ni_try_remove_attr_list+0x1558/0x1930 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:773 ni_write_inode+0xd14/0x10c0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3318 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1456 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x69b/0xfa0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1668 writeback_sb_inodes+0x8e3/0x11d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_writeback+0x458/0xc70 fs/fs-writeback.c:2068 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2211 [inline] wb_workfn+0x400/0xff0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2251 process_one_work+0x8a0/0x10e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2405 worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2552 kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:379 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ni->ni_lock); lock(&wnd->rw_lock); lock(&ni->ni_lock); lock(&wnd->rw_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kworker/u4:0/15666: #0: ffff888019e63938 ((wq_completion)writeback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x77e/0x10e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2378 #1: ffffc9000ae5fd20 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7c8/0x10e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2380 #2: ffff88804bad60e0 (&ni->ni_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_trylock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1141 [inline] #2: ffff88804bad60e0 (&ni->ni_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_write_inode+0x167/0x10c0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3252 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 15666 Comm: kworker/u4:0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc4-syzkaller-00051-g48b1320a674e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/25/2023 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:2) Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x2fe/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline] validate_chain+0x166b/0x58f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 __lock_acquire+0x1316/0x2070 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 down_write_nested+0x3d/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689 mark_as_free_ex+0x3d/0x330 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2464 run_deallocate+0x13b/0x230 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2534 ni_try_remove_attr_list+0x1558/0x1930 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:773 ni_write_inode+0xd14/0x10c0 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:3318 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1456 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x69b/0xfa0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1668 writeback_sb_inodes+0x8e3/0x11d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_writeback+0x458/0xc70 fs/fs-writeback.c:2068 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2211 [inline] wb_workfn+0x400/0xff0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2251 process_one_work+0x8a0/0x10e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2405 worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2552 kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:379 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 </TASK> BTRFS info (device loop3): qgroup scan completed (inconsistency flag cleared) --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup