Re: fuzzing bcachefs with dm-flakey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:12:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Perhaps it is worthwhile running the same tests on btrfs so we can
> something to compare the bcachefs behaviour to. I suspect that btrfs
> will fair little better on the single device, no checksums
> corruption test....

It's also a test we _should_ be doing much, much better on: we've got
validation code for every key type that we run on every metadata read,
so there's no excuses for thees bugs and they will be fixed.

Just a question of when and in what order...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux