Re: [PATCH v5 00/20] bio: check return values of bio_add_page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.05.23 17:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/2/23 4:19?AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> We have two functions for adding a page to a bio, __bio_add_page() which is
>> used to add a single page to a freshly created bio and bio_add_page() which is
>> used to add a page to an existing bio.
>>
>> While __bio_add_page() is expected to succeed, bio_add_page() can fail.
>>
>> This series converts the callers of bio_add_page() which can easily use
>> __bio_add_page() to using it and checks the return of bio_add_page() for
>> callers that don't work on a freshly created bio.
>>
>> Lastly it marks bio_add_page() as __must_check so we don't have to go again
>> and audit all callers.
> 
> Looks fine to me, though it would be nice if the fs and dm people could
> give this a quick look. Should not take long, any empty bio addition
> should, by definition, be able to use a non-checked page addition for
> the first page.
> 

I think the FS side is all covered. @Mike could you have a look at the dm
patches?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux