On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:09:02AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > Well, it seems like you are talking about something else than the > > existing cases in gfs2 and btrfs, that is you want full consistency > > between direct I/O and buffered I/O. That's something nothing in the > > kernel has ever provided, so I'd be curious why you think you need it > > and want different semantics from everyone else? > > Because I like code that is correct. Well, start with explaining your definition of correctness, why everyone else is "not correct", an how you can help fixing this correctness problem in the existing kernel. Thanks for your cooperation!
