Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] locks: allow support for write delegation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On May 24, 2023, at 11:08 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 16:52 -0700, Dai Ngo wrote:
>> Remove the check for F_WRLCK in generic_add_lease to allow file_lock
>> to be used for write delegation.
>> 
>> First consumer is NFSD.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/locks.c | 7 -------
>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
>> index df8b26a42524..08fb0b4fd4f8 100644
>> --- a/fs/locks.c
>> +++ b/fs/locks.c
>> @@ -1729,13 +1729,6 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, long arg, struct file_lock **flp, void **pr
>> if (is_deleg && !inode_trylock(inode))
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> 
>> - if (is_deleg && arg == F_WRLCK) {
>> - /* Write delegations are not currently supported: */
>> - inode_unlock(inode);
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
>> spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
>> time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
> 
> I'd probably move this back to the first patch in the series.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>

I asked him to move it to the end. Is it safe to take out this
check before write delegation is actually implemented?


--
Chuck Lever






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux