Re: [PATCH 5/9] block: introduce holder ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:30:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 06:00:05PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Looking at this code reminds me that we'll need a block dev lookup
> > function that takes a diskseq argument so we can lookup a block device
> > and check it against the diskseq number we provided so we can detect
> > "media" changes (images on a loop device etc). Idea being to pass
> > diskseq numbers via fsconfig().
> 
> You can already do this by checking right after opening but before
> using it.  In theory we could pass the seq down, and handle it further
> down, but I'm not sure this really solves anything.

BTW, why is there no code to lookup a bdev by O_PATH fd? It seems weird
that a lot of ioctls pass the device path to the kernel (btrfs comes to
mind). I can see certain things that would make this potentially a bit
tricky e.g., you'd not have access to the path/name of the device if you
want to show it somewhere such as in mountinfo but nothing that makes it
impossible afaict.

> 
> The main work here really is in the mount code.

Yeah, I'll get to this soon. Josef has mentioned that he'll convert
btrfs to the new mount api this cycle and we have that recorded on
video. And I think that otherwise all block device based filesystems
might have already been converted.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux