Re: [RFCv5 5/5] iomap: Add per-block dirty state tracking to improve performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> We set the per-block dirty status in ->write_begin. The check above happens in the
> writeback path when we are about to write the dirty data to the disk.
> What the check is doing is that, it checks if the block state is not dirty
> then skip it which means the block was not written to in the ->write_begin().
> Also the block with dirty status always means that the block is uptodate
> anyways.
> 
> Hope it helps!
> 

Definitely. I also checked your 1st RFC version to get more context. Thanks for
the explanation.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux