On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:17:23PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:49:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > On 5/12/23 16:26, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 12:39:34AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >> > > >> On Friday 2023-05-12 22:58, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > >>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:14:08PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > >>>> > > >>>> The currently SPDX list only knows "GPL-2.0-only" or "GPL-2.0-or-later", > > >>>> please edit. > > >>> > > >>> Where is that list? > > >> > > >> I just went to spdx.org and then chose "License List" from the > > >> horizontal top bar menu. > > > > > > Do we have anything more official? Quick grep through the source tree > > > says I'm following accepted usage. > > > > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst points to spdx.org for > > further info. > > > > or LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 contains this: > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html > > Thanks, I'll leave it at GPL-2.0 then. https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html says that GPL-2.0 is deprecated. Its replacement is https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html. Yes, they mean the same thing, but the new names were introduced to be clearer than the old ones. - Eric
