Re: [LSF/MM/BPF] Whither Highmem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:20:42AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> I see there's a couple of spots on the schedule open, so here's something
> fun we could talk about.
> 
> Highmem was originally introduced to support PAE36 (up to 64GB) on x86
> in the late 90s.  It's since been used to support a similar extension
> on ARM (maybe other 32-bit architectures?)
> 
> Things have changed a bit since then.  There aren't a lot of systems
> left which have more than 4GB of memory _and_ are incapable of running a
> 64-bit kernel.

Actual limit is lower. With 3G/1G userspace/kernel split you will have
somewhere about 700Mb of virtual address space for direct mapping.

But, I would like to get rid of highmem too. Not sure how realistic it is.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux