Re: [PATCH 00/40] Memory allocation profiling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:09:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2023 17:53:09 -0400
> Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The underscore is a legitimate complaint - I brought this up in
> > development, not sure why it got lost. We'll do something better with a
> > consistent suffix, perhaps kmem_cache_alloc_noacct().
> 
> Would "_noprofile()" be a better name. I'm not sure what "acct" means.

account - but _noprofile() is probably better. Didn't suggest it at
first because of an association in my head with CPU profiling, but
considering we already renamed the feature to memory allocation
profiling... :)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux