Re: [PATCH 00/40] Memory allocation profiling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 05:57 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:50:51AM +0200, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> > If anyone ever wants to use this code tagging framework for
> > something
> > else, they will also have to convert relevant functions to macros,
> > slowly changing the kernel to a minefield where local identifiers,
> > struct, union and enum tags, field names and labels must avoid name
> > conflict with a tagged function. For now, I have to remember that
> > alloc_pages is forbidden, but the list may grow.
> 
> Also, since you're not actually a kernel contributor yet...

You have an amazing talent for being wrong.  But even if you were
actually right about this, it would be an ad hominem personal attack on
a new contributor which crosses the line into unacceptable behaviour on
the list and runs counter to our code of conduct.

James




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux