On Wed, May 27 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, May 27 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:53:53PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:47:54AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'll retry the test with your stock writeback-v8 git branch w/o any
> > > > ext4 patches planned the next mere window mainline to see if I get the
> > > > same soft lockup, but I thought I should give you an early heads up.
> > >
> > > Confirmed. I had to run fsstress twice, but I was able to trigger a
> > > soft hangup with just the per-bdi v8 patches using ext4.
> >
> > As you requested, here's the .config file which I used. This was on a
> > Lenovo S10 (N270 Atom dual-core CPU, 1.5 gigs of memory, 5400 rpm hdd).
>
> If you have time, can you rerun with this little patch? It moves the
> super sync to a separate thread. Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index f71588c..8b30f29 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -218,10 +218,14 @@ static __init int bdi_class_init(void)
> }
> postcore_initcall(bdi_class_init);
>
> +static int bdi_sync_supers(void *unused);
> +
> static int __init default_bdi_init(void)
> {
> int err;
>
> + kthread_run(bdi_sync_supers, NULL, "bdi-super");
> +
> err = bdi_init(&default_backing_dev_info);
> if (!err)
> bdi_register(&default_backing_dev_info, NULL, "default");
> @@ -412,6 +416,20 @@ static void bdi_flush_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> generic_sync_bdi_inodes(NULL, &wbc);
> }
>
> +static int bdi_sync_supers(void *unused)
> +{
> + while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> + schedule_timeout(dirty_expire_interval * 10);
Woops, that should be
schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10));
of course, otherwise we sync quite a lot :-)
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
