Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Erm...it may be an unpopular opinion, but I find that more confusing
> than just ensuring that the s_time_gran > 1. I keep wondering if we
> might want to carve out other low-order bits too for some later purpose,
> at which point trying to check this using flags wouldn't work right. I
> think I might just stick with what I have here, at least for now.

But what if I set s_time_gran to 3 or 5?  You'd really want a warning
about that.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux