Hi all, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2009, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:49, James Bottomley >> <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> OK ... perhaps we have to wait a little harder: try this; it waits until >>> all the targets have disappeared from visibility via an event. >> That seems to work fine here. > > It's good for a short-term fix. For the longer term, I still think > it's a mistake to wait for the sdevs to be released before deleting the > target. It gives user programs the ability to block the host-removal > thread indefinitely. > Quite so. We should rather see to have the reference counting fixed properly, than this would go away automatically. So I just have to look for someone to fix my iSCSI bugs, than I could revamp my patchset ... Sigh. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
