On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:28:48PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 07:06:58 AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:11 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 03:18:05PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:49 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > ... > >> > > > Darrick, > >> > > > > >> > > > Quick question. > >> > > > You indicated that you would like to discuss the topics: > >> > > > Atomic file contents exchange > >> > > > Atomic directio writes > >> > > > >> > > This one ^^^^^^^^ topic should still get its own session, ideally with > >> > > Martin Petersen and John Garry running it. A few cloud vendors' > >> > > software defined storage stacks can support multi-lba atomic writes, and > >> > > some database software could take advantage of that to reduce nested WAL > >> > > overhead. > >> > > > >> > > >> > CC Martin. > >> > If you want to lead this session, please schedule it. > >> > > >> > > > Are those intended to be in a separate session from online fsck? > >> > > > Both in the same session? > >> > > > > >> > > > I know you posted patches for FIEXCHANGE_RANGE [1], > >> > > > but they were hiding inside a huge DELUGE and people > >> > > > were on New Years holidays, so nobody commented. > >> > > > >> > > After 3 years of sparse review comments, I decided to withdraw > >> > > FIEXCHANGE_RANGE from general consideration after realizing that very > >> > > few filesystems actually have the infrastructure to support atomic file > >> > > contents exchange, hence there's little to be gained from undertaking > >> > > fsdevel bikeshedding. > >> > > > >> > > > Perhaps you should consider posting an uptodate > >> > > > topic suggestion to let people have an opportunity to > >> > > > start a discussion before LSFMM. > >> > > > >> > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are we > >> > > spending too much time on LTS? How on earth do we prioritize projects > >> > > with all these drive by bots?? Why can't we support large engineering > >> > > efforts better???) than technical. > >> > > >> > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)". > >> > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big room > >> > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want. > >> > >> Ok, thank you. Hopefully we can get all the folks who do backports into > >> this one. That might be a big ask for Chandan, depending on when you > >> schedule it. > >> > >> (Unless it's schedule for 7pm :P) > >> > > > > Oh thanks for reminding me! > > I moved it to Wed 9am, so it is more convenient for Chandan. > > This maps to 9:30 AM for me. Thanks for selecting a time which is convenient > for me. Er... doesn't 9:30am for Chandan map to 9:00*pm* the previous evening for those of us in Vancouver? (Or I guess 9:30pm for Chandan if we actually are having a morning session?) Chandan: I'll ask Shirley to cancel our staff meeting so you don't have a crazy(er) meeting schedule during LSF. --D > -- > chandan
