Re: [PATCH next] shmem: minor fixes to splice-read implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 21:46:16 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> generic_file_splice_read() makes a couple of preliminary checks (for
> s_maxbytes and zero len), but shmem_file_splice_read() is called without
> those: so check them inside it.  (But shmem does not support O_DIRECT,
> so no need for that one here - and even if O_DIRECT support were stubbed
> in, it would still just be using the page cache.)
> 
> HWPoison: my reading of folio_test_hwpoison() is that it only tests the
> head page of a large folio, whereas splice_folio_into_pipe() will splice
> as much of the folio as it can: so for safety we should also check the
> has_hwpoisoned flag, set if any of the folio's pages are hwpoisoned.
> (Perhaps that ugliness can be improved at the mm end later.)
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] shmem: minor fixes to splice-read implementation
      commit: 72887c976a7c9ee7527f4a2e3d109576efea98ab

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux