Re: [PATCH] overlayfs: Trigger file re-evaluation by IMA / EVM after writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/6/23 10:05, Paul Moore wrote:
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 6:26 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:14:49PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Overlayfs fails to notify IMA / EVM about file content modifications
and therefore IMA-appraised files may execute even though their file
signature does not validate against the changed hash of the file
anymore. To resolve this issue, add a call to integrity_notify_change()
to the ovl_release() function to notify the integrity subsystem about
file changes. The set flag triggers the re-evaluation of the file by
IMA / EVM once the file is accessed again.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/overlayfs/file.c       |  4 ++++
  include/linux/integrity.h |  6 ++++++
  security/integrity/iint.c | 13 +++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
index 6011f955436b..19b8f4bcc18c 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
  #include <linux/security.h>
  #include <linux/mm.h>
  #include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/integrity.h>
  #include "overlayfs.h"

  struct ovl_aio_req {
@@ -169,6 +170,9 @@ static int ovl_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)

  static int ovl_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
  {
+     if (file->f_flags & O_ACCMODE)
+             integrity_notify_change(inode);
+
       fput(file->private_data);

       return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h
index 2ea0f2f65ab6..cefdeccc1619 100644
--- a/include/linux/integrity.h
+++ b/include/linux/integrity.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum integrity_status {
  #ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY
  extern struct integrity_iint_cache *integrity_inode_get(struct inode *inode);
  extern void integrity_inode_free(struct inode *inode);
+extern void integrity_notify_change(struct inode *inode);

I thought we concluded that ima is going to move into the security hook
infrastructure so it seems this should be a proper LSM hook?

We are working towards migrating IMA/EVM to the LSM layer, but there
are a few things we need to fix/update/remove first; if anyone is
curious, you can join the LSM list as we've been discussing some of
these changes this week.  Bug fixes like this should probably remain
as IMA/EVM calls for the time being, with the understanding that they
will migrate over with the rest of IMA/EVM.

That said, we should give Mimi a chance to review this patch as it is
possible there is a different/better approach.  A bit of patience may
be required as I know Mimi is very busy at the moment.


There may be a better approach actually by increasing the inode's i_version,
which then should trigger the appropriate path in ima_check_last_writer().



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux