Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 07:48:21 +0100
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7f7947d6-2a03-688b-dc5e-3887553f0106@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> BTW, will this two patch depend on the others in this patch series ?

Yes.  You'll need patches that affect TCP at least so that TCP supports
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, so 04-08 and perhaps 09.  It's also on top of the patches
that remove ITER_PIPE on my iov-extract branch, but I don't think that should
affect you.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
  - From: David Howells
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
  - From: Xiubo Li
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
  - From: Xiubo Li

References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
  - From: Xiubo Li
- [RFC PATCH v2 00/48] splice, net: Replace sendpage with sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
  - From: David Howells
- [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] KASAN: null-ptr-deref Read in ida_free (3)
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] KASAN: null-ptr-deref Read in ida_free (3)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 37/48] ceph: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather than sendpage()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]