Re: [External] Re: [PATCH V4 4/5] cachefiles: narrow the scope of triggering EPOLLIN events in ondemand mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2023/3/28 22:19, David Howells 写道:
Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+		if (!xa_empty(xa)) {
+			xa_lock(xa);
+			xa_for_each_marked(xa, index, req, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
+				if (!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
+					mask |= EPOLLIN;
+					break;
+				}
+			}
+			xa_unlock(xa);
+		}

I wonder if there's a more efficient way to do this.  I guess it depends on
how many reqs you expect to get in a queue.  It might be worth taking the
rcu_read_lock before calling xa_lock() and holding it over the whole loop.

Thanks for the advice, will use rcu_read_lock(unlock) to replace it.
David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux