On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:59:09PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > That's a great idea. Two questions - do we want to make that > > WARN_ON_ONCE()? And then do we want to include a WARN_ON_ONCE for a > > non-supported type? Doesn't seem like high risk as they've all been used > > with ITER_IOVEC until now, though. > > Scratch that last one, user_backed should double as that as well. At > least currently, where ITER_UBUF and ITER_IOVEC are the only two > iterators that hold user backed memory. Quite. As for the WARN_ON_ONCE vs. WARN_ON... No preferences, really.
