Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 12:11:51 -0700
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2d33d8dc-ed1f-ed74-5cc5-040e321ac34f@kernel.dk>

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:06 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> See Al's suggestion in the other thread, I like that a lot better as it
> avoids any potential wack-a-mole with potentially similar cases.

Ok, this is all the legacy "no iter_read/write" case, so that looks
fine to me too.

               Linus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
  - From: Linus Torvalds

References:
- [PATCHSET v2 0/4] Turn single segment imports into ITER_UBUF
  - From: Jens Axboe
- [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
  - From: Jens Axboe

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: make do_loop_readv_writev() deal with ITER_UBUF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux