On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:35, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> +int sysfs_rename_link(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobject *targ,
>> + const char *old, const char *new)
>> +{
>> + sysfs_remove_link(kobj, old);
>> + return sysfs_create_link(kobj, targ, new);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Removal and creation are done in the reverse order compared to the one
> used in device rename. The important difference is that previously
> failed operation was noop whereas it now would remove the current
> link. I think the old order is correct.
The target string is composed on-demand, and it always points to the
same kobject and *targ is not needed, right?
Can't we just change the name of the link, instead of removing and
re-creating the entire thing, and all these issues go away?
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
