Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Well, it can be trivially fixed by checking the removed flag. The > add/rm thing is designed to help additions and removals of multiple > nodes at one go and I'd really like to see it working that way. Any > chance you can change code toward that direction? Yes. We definitely need to check the removed flag in sysfs_add_one. Regardless of anything else. I need to sleep on this but I am inclined to get rid of the rest of the complications simply by failing the removal of non-empty directories. Going through the upper layers and making them properly responsible for their actions. I am afraid friendlier in this circumstance might equate to easier to misuse and let code bugs pile up. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
