There is no need to declare an extra tables to just create directory, this can be easily be done with a prefix path with register_sysctl(). Simplify this registration. Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This is part of the effort to phase out calls that can recurse from sysctl registration [0]. If you have a tree to take this in feel free to take it, or I can take it too through sysclt-next. Let me know! This file has no explicit maintainer, so I assume there is no tree. If I so no one taking it I can take in as part of sysctl-next later. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230310223947.3917711-1-mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u kernel/utsname_sysctl.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c b/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c index f50398cb790d..019e3a1566cf 100644 --- a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c +++ b/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c @@ -123,15 +123,6 @@ static struct ctl_table uts_kern_table[] = { {} }; -static struct ctl_table uts_root_table[] = { - { - .procname = "kernel", - .mode = 0555, - .child = uts_kern_table, - }, - {} -}; - #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL /* * Notify userspace about a change in a certain entry of uts_kern_table, @@ -147,7 +138,7 @@ void uts_proc_notify(enum uts_proc proc) static int __init utsname_sysctl_init(void) { - register_sysctl_table(uts_root_table); + register_sysctl("kernel", uts_kern_table); return 0; } -- 2.39.1
