On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:14:33PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 02:11:27PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:13:54PM -0800, Jeff Xu wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:28 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > kernel/pid_sysctl.h | 3 +-- > > > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Acked-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Andrew, kernel/pid_sysctl.h is new, not on v6.3-rc1 and so I cannot > > carry this on sysctl-next. Can you carry this patch on your tree? > > > > I see Eric Biggers already took in the fs-verity patch, so I will drop > > that from my queue. > > > > I can take the rest in this series. > > > > I will also hold off on the last patch which deprecates the routine > > register_sysctl_paths() until after say the first part of the merge > > window. > > > > This will allow all of our trees to work on linux-next without conflict. > > > > Let me know if this is OK with you and Eric! > > > > That's fine with me. I applied the fsverity patch based on your cover letter > that said it was okay > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302202826.776286-1-mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx). Yeah it perfectly fine! > If you'd > like to take all the patches so that you can remove register_sysctl_paths() in > the same cycle, that would be fine too; it's up to you. Nah it's fine, no rush in this. One small step at a time. Luis
