On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:30:25AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 04:44:06PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:56 AM Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Turns out for typical consumers the resulting creds would be identical > > > and this can be checked upfront, avoiding the hard work. > > > > I've applied this v3 of the two patches. > > > > Normally it would go through Al, but he's clearly been under the > > weather and is drowning in email. Besides, I'm comfortable with this > > particular set of patches anyway as I was involved in the previous > > round of access() overhead avoidance with the whole RCU grace period > > thing. > > > > So I think we're all better off having Al look at any iov_iter issues. > > > > Anybody holler if there are issues, > > Fwiw, as long as you, Al, and others are fine with it and I'm aware of > it I'm happy to pick up more stuff like this. I've done it before and > have worked in this area so I'm happy to help with some of the load. TBH, I've missed that series; patches look sane, so consider them belatedly ACKed. And I've no problem with sharing the load - you have been doing that with idmapping stuff anyway. As far as I'm concerned, I generally trust your taste; it doesn't matter that I won't disagree with specific decisions, of course, but...
