Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Filesystem backporting to stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:48:23PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Another knot that I think we need to slice through is the question of
> what to do when support for LTS kernels becomes sparse.  Case in point:
> 
> Oracle produces a kernel based on 5.4 and 5.15.  We're not going to
> introduce one based on 5.10.  If Amir stops supporting 5.10, what do we
> do about 5.4?  If a bugfix appears that needs to be applied to 5.4-6.1,
> Greg will not let Chandan backport it to 5.4 until Chandan either takes
> responsibility for 5.10, or tricks someone else into do it.

And this is soon going to become a much bigger problem with 6.1-lts
in the near future will start gating fixes flowing back to 5.15,
5.10 and 5.4....

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux