On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff noticed a problem with the error handling in cifs_follow_link > that brought up a question about how follow_link is supposed to be > handling errors. His change has a sideeffect of now > Is it ok to return errors on follow_link - seems strange to return > them indicectly via set_link? Sorry about the typo indecently was supposed to be "indirectly" (return errors on set_link) :) -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
