> Benchmarking results show that SSDFS is capable: Is there performance data showing IOPS? These comparisions include file systems that don't support zoned devices natively, maybe that's why IOPS comparisons cannot be made? > (3) decrease the write amplification factor compared with: > 1.3x - 116x (ext4), > 14x - 42x (xfs), > 6x - 9x (btrfs), > 1.5x - 50x (f2fs), > 1.2x - 20x (nilfs2); > (4) prolong SSD lifetime compared with: Is this measuring how many times blocks are erased? I guess this measurement includes the background I/O from ssdfs migration and moving? > 1.4x - 7.8x (ext4), > 15x - 60x (xfs), > 6x - 12x (btrfs), > 1.5x - 7x (f2fs), > 1x - 4.6x (nilfs2). Thanks, Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
