Re: EXT vs XFS at 80% filled filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Theodore,

I am facing some weird problem of cross compiling libuuid sources. I
downloaded e2fsprogs and cross-compiled them but when I do "make
install-libs" it doesn't really install libuuid.so but installs
libuuid.a.

Can I have some pointers to build libuuid.so to have it in my toolchain
libraries.

I have crawled through web but couldn't get any nice solution to this.

Thanks in Advance
-Miline

On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:34 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:12:22PM +0530, Milind Dumbare wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have heard of XFS's performance is not good as compared to EXT3 when  
> > the filesystem(disk) is 80% filled with data. Is it true? I have went  
> > through lots of performance documents of both XFS and EXT3 but could not  
> > find such performance benchmarking (for 80% full filesystems).
> 
> I've not heard of any such performance metrics, and I suspect it would
> very much depend on how the filesystem was "aged".  A filesystem that
> has been in use for a few years and is at 80% capacity will behave
> very different from a brand-new filesystem which was freshly formatted
> and then filled with a few large files until said filesystem was 80%
> full.
> 
> 							- Ted
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux