(not reviewed this yet, just a kerneldoc warning first before I forget)
Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:33:22AM +0000:
> diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.c b/fs/9p/fid.c
> index 805151114e96..8c1697619f3d 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/fid.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/fid.c
> @@ -41,14 +40,24 @@ void v9fs_fid_add(struct dentry *dentry, struct p9_fid **pfid)
> *pfid = NULL;
> }
>
> +static bool v9fs_is_writeable(int mode)
> +{
> + if ((mode & P9_OWRITE) || (mode & P9_ORDWR))
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * v9fs_fid_find_inode - search for an open fid off of the inode list
> * @inode: return a fid pointing to a specific inode
> + * @writeable: only consider fids which are writeable
`make M=fs/9p W=1` complains about doc discreptancy here,
writeable vs. want_writeable.
These are a pain, but let's make sure new ones don't creep in...
(I just wish we could make W=1 the default for part of the subtree, but
I didn't find an easy way to do so last time I checked -- perhaps you'll
have more luck if you have time to look)
> * @uid: return a fid belonging to the specified user
> + * @any: ignore uid as a selection criteria
> *
> */
> -
> -static struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_find_inode(struct inode *inode, kuid_t uid)
> +struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_find_inode(struct inode *inode, bool want_writeable,
> + kuid_t uid, bool any)
--
Dominique
