Re: copy on write for splice() from file to pipe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ok, so I decided to try to take a look.
> 
> Somebody who actually does networking (and drivers in particular)
> should probably check this, but it *looks* like the IPv4 TCP case
> (just to pick the ony I looked at) gores through
> tcp_sendpage_locked(), which does
> 
>        if (!(sk->sk_route_caps & NETIF_F_SG))
>                return sock_no_sendpage_locked(sk, page, offset, size, flags);
> 
> which basically says "if you can't handle fragmented socket buffers,
> do that 'no_sendpage' case".
> 
> So that will basically end up just falling back to a kernel
> 'sendmsg()', which does a copy and then it's stable.
> 
> But for the networks that *can* handle fragmented socket buffers, it
> then calls do_tcp_sendpages() instead, which just creates a skb
> fragment of the page (with tcp_build_frag()).
> 
> I wonder if that case should just require NETIF_F_HW_CSUM?

NETIF_F_SG already depends on checksum offload (either via
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM or something else that is equivalent).

So are you guys just imagining non-existant problems?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux