Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC]: File system data placement for zoned block devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09.02.23 11:06, Hans Holmberg wrote:
> It takes a significant amount of time and trouble to build, run and understand
> benchmarks for these applications. Modeling the workloads using fio
> minimizes the set-up work and would enable more developers to actually
> run these things. The workload definitions could also help developers
> understanding what sort of IO that these use cases generate.

True, but I think Adam has a point here. IIRC mmtests comes with some scripts
to download, build and run the desired applications and then do the maths.

In this day and age people would probably want to use a container with the
application inside and some automation around it to run the benchmark and 
present the results.

Don't get me wrong. Simple fio snippets are definitively what I would prefer
as well, but creating these does require a lot of insight into the inner
workings of a desired user-space workload. Of cause once that is achieved we
can easily add this workload to fsperf and have some sort of CI testing for
it to make sure we don't regress here.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux