Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 15:41:54 -0800
Cc: viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <93c1e281-82a5-d7d0-04b1-67ac2cf3d0fa@kernel.org>

On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 21:01:14 +0800 Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Could you please take a look at this patchset? Or should I ping
> Alexey Dobriyan?
> 

[patch 1/2]: Alexey wasn't keen on the v1 patch.  What changed?

[patch 2/2]: What is the benefit from this change?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
  - From: Chao Yu
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
  - From: Chao Yu
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
  - From: Chao Yu

Prev by Date: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] mm: vmscan: refactor updating reclaimed pages in reclaim_state
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] proc: fix to check name length in proc_lookup_de()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux