Re: LSF/MM/BPF 2023 IOMAP conversion status update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 05:06:47AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> There's maybe a
> separate discussion to be had for "What should the API be for filesystems
> to access metadata on the block device" because I don't believe the
> page-cache based APIs are easy for fs authors to use.

OK sure, and *why* that would be good, yes sure. Perhaps that should be
dicussed first though as then it I think may be easier to possibly
celebrate IOMAP.

> Maybe some related topics are
> "What testing should we require for some of these ancient filesystems?"

Oh yes....

> "Whose job is it to convert these 35 filesystems anyway, can we just
> delete some of them?"

> "Is there a lower-performance but easier-to-implement API than iomap
> for old filesystems that only exist for compatibiity reasons?"

Yes...

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux