Re: [PATCH 02/31] fscrypt: Add some folio helper functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:23:46PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> fscrypt_is_bounce_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_is_bounce_page()
> and fscrypt_pagecache_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_pagecache_page().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/fscrypt.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fscrypt.h b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> index 4f5f8a651213..c2c07d36fb3a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fscrypt.h
> @@ -273,6 +273,16 @@ static inline struct page *fscrypt_pagecache_page(struct page *bounce_page)
>  	return (struct page *)page_private(bounce_page);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool fscrypt_is_bounce_folio(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	return folio->mapping == NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct folio *fscrypt_pagecache_folio(struct folio *bounce_folio)
> +{
> +	return bounce_folio->private;
> +}

ext4_bio_write_folio() is still doing:

	bounce_page = fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks(&folio->page, ...);

Should it be creating a "bounce folio" instead, or is that not in the scope of
this patchset?

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux